The foreclosed home in Aurora, Ill., was an outdated, unkempt eyesore until crews arrived this fall, performing thousands of dollars of work to make it attractive and modern, inside and out.
But it wasn’t until workers walked across the street to ask for some water that neighbors Mario Cervantes and Oralia Balderas-Cervantes learned that a corporation, not a consumer, had bought the house, intending to turn it into a rental property. Despite being landlords themselves, the couple aren’t sure they like the idea.
“If it’s going to be a company that is watching out for the community, yes,” Cervantes said. “If it’s going to be a company that is watching out for themselves, no.”
Added Balderas-Cervantes: “I’d rather see a homeowner. A lot of renters don’t care. It’s like renting a car versus buying a car. It’s different.”
Similar scenarios and concerns are unfolding in markets hard-hit by the housing crisis. Well-capitalized, out-of-town private equity funds are scouring neighborhoods, paying cash for distressed single-family homes and renting them out. The opportunities are plentiful, enabling investment groups to profit from low home prices, rising rents and an increase in the number of potential renters.
The transactions are returning vacant properties to active use. But they also are stoking fears among neighbors and municipalities about the long-term effect of large, private investors — including many that are operating under the radar — in their communities.
“This scares the hell out of me,” said Ed Jacob, executive director of Neighborhood Housing Services of Chicago Inc. “In this rush to say this is a new asset class, are we creating the next community development problem?
“You talk to them, and it’s all about neighborhood recovery. They all have the narrative down.”
The general strategy of the companies is the same: buy low, make the necessary upgrades, fill them with tenants and then sell the homes in three to seven years. With companies and analysts anticipating projected returns of at least 8 percent, there also is talk of creating publicly traded real estate investment trusts.
“What this reminds me of is the dot-com boom,” said Rick Sharga, executive vice president of Carrington Mortgage Holdings LLC, a California firm. “That’s what this feels like. Every investor in America wants to buy foreclosures and turn them into rentals.”
Two statistics increasing that appetite are the homeownership rate and rental rates. Foreclosures, tight lending conditions and wary consumers have pushed down the nation’s homeownership rate to 65.5 percent at the end of September, according to census data. Meanwhile, the percentage of vacant rental units has been on a steady decline since 2010 as more people opt for leases rather than mortgages.
But investors aren’t flocking to all neighborhoods equally. Most want homes in desirable neighborhoods with strong area employment. They also look at the strength of local rules protecting landlords in disputes with tenants.
After vetting the tenant and securing a lease, property managers say they routinely drive by the homes and sometimes schedule inside inspections to protect their investment.
It remains to be seen whether their expectations will be met. One problem with the business model is there’s no performance track record to speak of. And as housing prices slowly recover, acquisition costs also will increase and cut into returns.
There also isn’t any history on property management firms tasked with overseeing so many scattered-site rental properties. Any well-publicized mistakes involving poorly maintained properties or wronged tenants could taint investors’ reputations.
That’s one reason why big-name players are likely to avoid buying in neighborhoods where they fear a greater chance of eviction proceedings occurring.
“You make one mistake in those properties, and you’ll be toast,” Sharga said.
While some funds have outlined plans for foreclosure-to-rental conversions, it’s impossible to easily quantify the purchases. For one thing, purchasers have formed various corporate entities to do the deals. In other cases, there’s uncertainty about whether investors plan to resell the homes immediately or rent them and outsource property management to other firms.
An early leader in the sector is Waypoint Real Estate Group LLC, which recently secured more than $300 million in financing from Citigroup to expand its national portfolio. Unlike other companies, Oakland, Calif.-based Waypoint is handling the purchase, rehab, renting and management of homes internally.
“We’re providing an answer to what has been a challenging period of time,” said Charles Young, Waypoint’s regional director.
By design, its portfolio includes homes of various sizes in different types of neighborhoods, with rents running from $1,250 to $2,600 a month. On average, it invests $20,000 in property improvements; much of that work is done in the kitchens and bathrooms. It likes two-year leases because it finds the occupants act more like owners than renters.
In fact, Waypoint tries not to use the word “renters” because it argues the term has negative connotations. “We call them ‘residents,’ ” Young said. “We find ourselves trying to change that perspective.”
Felipe and Mily Mendoza and their family have been renters since losing their home to foreclosure in 1998. Five weeks ago, they moved into a Waypoint home in Aurora close to an elementary school. It’s a home with updated bathrooms and a spacious kitchen that easily accommodates the large oval table for their extended family.
Felipe Mendoza doesn’t mind the $1,575 monthly rent because the home is in much better shape than their last rental, and he likes the two-year lease. He’s also participating in a Waypoint program that rewards him with points for taking care of the property, paying the rent on time and repairing any credit problems.
At the end of the two years, accumulated points are credited toward a purchase of the home, something Mendoza would like to do, now that he’s gotten to know the neighbors. “Everybody told me, ‘We hope you keep the home,’ ” he said.
